Logic Programming with Defaults and Argumentation Theories
نویسندگان
چکیده
We define logic programs with defaults and argumentation theories, a new framework that unifies most of the earlier proposals for defeasible reasoning in logic programming. We present a model-theoretic semantics and study its reducibility and well-behavior properties. We use the framework as an elegant and flexible foundation to extend and improve upon Generalized Courteous Logic Programs (GCLP) [19]—one of the popular forms of defeasible reasoning. The extensions include higherorder and object-oriented features of Hilog and F-Logic [7,21]. The improvements include much simpler, incremental reasoning algorithms and more intuitive behavior. The framework and its Courteous family instantiation were implemented as an extension to the FLORA-2 system.
منابع مشابه
Transaction Logic with Defaults and Argumentation Theories
Transaction Logic (abbr., T R) [9,12] is a logic that gracefully integrates both declarative and procedural knowledge. It has proved itself as a powerful logic language for many advanced applications, including actions specification and planning in AI. In a parallel development, much work has been devoted to various theories of defeasible reasoning [19]. In this paper, we unify these two stream...
متن کاملDefeasibility in answer set programs with defaults and argumentation rules
Defeasible reasoning has been studied extensively in the last two decades and many different and dissimilar approaches are currently on the table. This multitude of ideas has made the field hard to navigate and the different techniques hard to compare. Our earlier work on Logic Programming with Defaults and Argumentation Theories (LPDA) introduced a degree of unification into the approaches tha...
متن کاملDefeasibility in Answer Set Programs via Argumentation Theories
Defeasible reasoning has been studied extensively in the last two decades and many different and dissimilar approaches are currently on the table. This multitude of ideas has made the field hard to navigate and the different techniques hard to compare. Our earlier work on Logic Programming with Defaults and Argumentation Theories (LPDA) introduced a degree of unification into the approaches tha...
متن کاملEmbedding default logic in propositional argumentation systems
In this paper we present a transformation of finite propositional default theories into socalled propositional argumentation systems. This transformation allows to characterize all notions of Reiter’s default logic in the framework of argumentation systems. As a consequence, computing extensions, or determining wether a given formula belongs to one extension or all extensions can be answered wi...
متن کاملDefault Reasoning with Speci cityPhan
We present a new approach to reasoning with speciicity which subsumes inheritance reasoning. The new approach diiers from other approaches in the literature in the way priority between defaults is handled. Here, it is context sensitive rather than context independent as in other approaches. We show that any context independent handling of priorities between defaults as advocated in the literatu...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009